[License-review] [PROPOSAL] Invite Creative Commons to submit CC0 Dedication.
Chad Perrin
perrin at apotheon.com
Tue Jan 3 18:31:27 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:09:18AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> Does anyone here on the license review committee think that inviting
> Creative Commons to submit the CC0 Dedication for OSI approval is a bad
> idea, and if so, why?
>
> Let's try to uncover any obvious objections before approaching CC. We
> don't necessarily need unanimity, or even consensus, but we should at
> least take a preliminary look at the specific text before inviting CC to
> do anything. Here's the text:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
It looks to me perfectly consistent with the OSD, and it has been
certified as compliant with the copyfree standard definition -- which
should essentially be consistent with a subset of licenses that meet the
requirements of the OSD.
>
> By the way, note that CC doesn't have a direct link path to the legal
> text from their front page. Instead, they guide the rightsholder
> through an interactive Q&A, I suppose in order to make sure the holder
> understands what they're doing. That process starts here:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/
I find that an awfully misguided approach, and think that the CC guys
(presumably in service to an attempt to help people who aren't lawyers)
end up obscuring a lot of the likely actual legal effects of their
licenses by way of the "user friendly" interface to license selection and
understanding.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
More information about the License-review
mailing list