[License-review] OSI recognition for Creative Commons Zero License?
rick at linuxmafia.com
Thu Feb 2 20:51:01 UTC 2012
Quoting Carl Boettiger (cboettig at gmail.com):
> I would like to submit the Creative Commons zero license for
> consideration. I am new to this list, forgive me if it has already been
A number of times, actually, most recently last month.
What practical problem do you consider this licence (in truth, a professed
public domain declaration with a failsafe fallback to a simple
permissive licence) to solve that is not already solved by MIT License
or Fair License?
> The scientific community is increasingly embracing this option as the most
> open and compatible license. It is required by scientific data
> repositories (that also archive scientific software, with cite-able DOIs)
> such as Dryad <http://datadryad.org/depositing#whycc0>.
Dryad's requirement of CCO is declared on that page to apply to
submitted data files, not to associated 'software scripts and other
files important to the article' submitted with them.
Rick Moen "The four seasons are Spring, Summer, Winter and Fall.
rick at linuxmafia.com For California publications, change to Mudslide,
McQ! (4x80) Hillfire, Flood, and Earthquake." -- FakeAPStylebook
More information about the License-review