[License-review] Submitting MPL for Approval

[Luis Villa]

Hi, David-
Thank you for the kind words. I'm probably the right person for
questions and suggestions, but note that we've essentially closed
comments at this point- it is frozen unless there is a absolute
show-stopper problem.

Thanks-
Luis

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:38 PM, David Smith <packetspike at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am very impressed with the thought and effort that went into the creation
> of this document,
>
> Who may I forward questions and suggestions to if I were to want to add my
> 2cents?
>
> thank you for you time and assistance.
>
> Packet Spike
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel at red-bean.com> wrote:
>>
>> John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> writes:
>> >I have reviewed it, and IMO it is obviously open-source and should be
>> >pushed through.  No tricks, no traps.
>>
>> Thanks Josh and Bruce.  I've read the license again too now, and
>> examined its diff against RC2, and completely concur: this is an open
>> source license and should be approved.
>>
>> Agree with Bruce that the clause that opens the door to license
>> proliferation is not in itself grounds for rejection.  (We should of
>> course still do everything we can to stop proliferation!)
>>
>> Since Luis's RC3 post has been on this list for a while, and no one has
>> found objections, I'll transmit our recommendation to the Board that OSI
>> approve it, in a separate mail.
>>
>> Best,
>> -Karl
>> _______________________________________________
>> License-review mailing list
>> License-review at opensource.org
>> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "It's Unix or NoThing"
> - lost on the Y gen
> - Stuck in the X gen
>