[License-review] Submitting MPL for Approval

[Bruce Perens]

Sigh. This makes it all too easy for people to make derived versions of 
the license, and thus it drives license proliferation. This is not 
grounds for rejection of the license.

A lot of the 69 licenses currently on the approved list are derivative 
of older Mozilla text.

     Bruce

On 12/08/2011 07:48 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> 10.3. Modified Versions
> >
> >If you create software not governed by this License, and you want to
> >create a new license for such software, you may create and use a
> >modified version of this License if you rename the license and remove
> >any references to the name of the license steward (except to note that
> >such modified license differs from this License).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20111208/02c4c072/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20111208/02c4c072/attachment.p7s>