WebM license third-party submission

[Lawrence Rosen]

Russ Nelson suggested:
> Same thing for Larry's
> meetings with his clients.  Web streaming, we want web streaming.

OK, Russ, I'm happy to let you into my meetings that concern you, as long as
you let me into your meetings that concern me. (I'd never accept a client
that was adverse to you, Russ!) Perhaps Chris will make the same deal with
you?

By the way, watch what you ask for. Web streams of my meetings with clients
would be very boring.

> All companies' board meetings are as closed
> as Google's, and all lawyers meet in secret with their clients.

Not true for non-profits, and not true for all lawyers' meetings, even with
clients present. And there is very little reason for OSI's meetings to be
closed, unless you want to say private nasty things about Chris or me.

In any event, this isn't the important issue that Chris raised. I'm
confident now that discussions about the WebM license--when and if it is
submitted by Google--will be public.

/Larry



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nelson at crynwr.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:28 PM
> To: license-review at opensource.org
> Subject: RE: WebM license third-party submission
<snip>