Revised License Committee Report for March 2009

wtfpl user wtfpl.user at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 19 15:07:16 UTC 2009


2009/3/19 Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com>:
> This license does nothing to protect the licensor, and gives the
> licensees all permissions.  It *is* the public domain, is not a
> license, and is not needed by anybody whose purpose is anything other
> than to annoy others, waste their time, and create a public bad.

Wow. You should submit a patch to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

>
> This license has gone before the board and has been rejected.  Further
> discussion here is off-topic.  I expect self-discipline, but it it's
> lacking, I will take steps.

Do I get lashed with a wet noodle?



More information about the License-review mailing list