Non-attorney-reviewed submissions

[Bruce Perens]

I can only think of one, and IMO that one shouldn't have been approved.
IPA was submitted by an attorney.
MirOS seems to originate in competent legal practice for a Moral Right 
of Author regime.

What else am I missing?

Russ Nelson wrote:
> Bruce Perens writes:
>  > How many of the licenses submitted in the past year that had _not_ 
>  > received any attorney review prior to submission have been approved?
>
> Without looking, I estimate "most of them".
>
>