[Fwd: Re: For Approval: The Azure License]

[Bruce Perens]

Luis Villa wrote:
> It seems like it'd be terrific to require a statement of motive for
> the license (and perhaps description of the community the license is
> intended to serve?) as part of the license-review discussion.
He wants a permissive license that is simple to read and has an 
attribution requirement.

It's pretty boring, maybe not worth making the license propagation 
problem worse. There's no such license already approved?

    Thanks

    Bruce