For Approval: Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, v1.0
Russ Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Wed Feb 18 02:02:32 UTC 2009
Christopher Schmidt writes:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:36:48PM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
> > Not until we say so.
>
> How is that? Open source is a term.
True. It is a term with a generally-agreed meaning: OSI approval.
> I release open source (or Open Source) software that is not under an OSI
> Approved license, because that software meets the Open Source
> Definition.
How is anyone to know that? By this standard, "open source" means
everything and nothing. It means whatever the person who is saying it
wants it to mean -- including people who are hostile to open source,
free software, open data, and free anything.
I reject that standard.
If you don't want to use an OSI Approved license, then call it free
software. Open Source has a meaning: the use of an OSI Approved
License.
Do I have the legal ability to force you to use open source this way?
No. It is not a trademark. But do I have to cooperate with you if
you use it this way? No, I do not.
--
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | Delegislation is a slippery
Cloudmade supports http://openstreetmap.org/ | slope to prosperity.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | Fewer laws, more freedom.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | (Not a GOP supporter).
More information about the License-review
mailing list