[License-discuss] AI-generated emails
Bruce Perens
bruce at perens.com
Wed Sep 9 18:55:44 UTC 2026
I did notice a recent poster was using a latin parody of my name.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 6:00 AM Nick Vidal <nick.vidal at opensource.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We would like to apologize for the various emails that were sent recently,
> which were found to be AI generated.
>
> We do not allow posts generated by AI without careful review from the
> author and will reject posts where we suspect that an AI has been
> responsible for all or most of a message.
>
> The use of AI to help members to better understand and respond to a
> complex topic, especially when the discussions are in a foreign language
> and very legalese, is appropriate for the purpose of making the discussions
> more accessible.
>
> However, we have identified that license-discuss and license-review are
> being used as a proof-of-concept to demonstrate that an AI system can
> autonomously engage and even draft an open source license for review.
>
> We believe that this behavior goes against the "Respect time and
> attention" from our Code of Conduct <https://opensource.org/codeofconduct>.
> We'll be updating it to better reflect the use of AI.
>
> We would like to thank one of our members who provided valuable feedback
> on this matter. We'll share more details soon.
>
> Thank you all for your comprehension.
>
> Kind regards,
> OSI Moderators
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
--
Bruce Perens K6BP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20260909/642ca253/attachment.htm>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list