[License-discuss] Python-2.0.1 and CNRI-Python-GPL-Compatible

[Max Mehl]

> But OSI only approved Python-2.0 as an Open Source license, as well as the old CNRI-Python part. This is why I suggest OSI to approve Python-2.0.1 and CNRI-Python-GPL-Compatible as Open Source licenses, and mark Python-2.0 and CNRI-Python as superseded. Is there any reason not to?

Thanks for the comments to far. I haven’t seen any objections against Python-2.0.1, just thought about the status of CNRI-Python-GPL-Compatible as it isn’t a standalone license (just like CNRI-Python which has been approved).

Shall I open a thread on license-review@ to come closer to a decision?

Best,
Max

________________________________

Pflichtangaben anzeigen<https://www.deutschebahn.com/pflichtangaben/20260313>

Nähere Informationen zur Datenverarbeitung im DB-Konzern finden Sie hier: https://www.deutschebahn.com/de/konzern/datenschutz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20260313/16f0bcc0/attachment.htm>