[License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

[James]

On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 11:47 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana at redhat.com> wrote:
> Maybe it would be better for OSI to have the expectation that license
> review will only take place some months or years after a license is
> already in practical use. Users of new licenses could be expected to
> make clear that the licenses are not OSI-approved.

This is a really brilliant proposal that I think we should accept. It
would help with license proliferation, and it would probably help
prove that we only need five licenses for new works: MIT, ALv2,
[A|L]GPLv3+.

Thanks,
James

>
> Richard
>