[License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License]

[Richard Fontana]

Potential for abuse in certain cases -- suppose a company writes a
controversial license and wants it to get OSI-approved, or wants to
see a third-party-submitted license rejected, and tries to manipulate
the process by encouraging employees to sign up for individual
memberships.

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:48 AM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/19 9:41 AM, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
> > One solution could be anonymous voting by OSI members for license approval in addition to a discussion period.
> Interesting thought.
>
> Pam
>
> Pamela S. Chestek
> Chestek Legal
> PO Box 2492
> Raleigh, NC 27602
> +1 919-800-8033
> pamela at chesteklegal.com
> www.chesteklegal.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org



-- 
Richard Fontana
Senior Commercial Counsel
Red Hat, Inc.