[License-discuss] Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0
Richard Fontana
rfontana at redhat.com
Mon Jul 29 17:52:57 UTC 2019
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:44 PM Smith, McCoy <mccoy.smith at intel.com> wrote:
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Thorsten Glaser
> >>Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 10:37 AM
> >>To: license-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> >>Subject: [License-discuss] Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0
>
> >>• it looks like it has been written without a lawyer involved at
> all, not even looking it over after the fact, “You must not do
> anything with this software that triggers a rule that you cannot
> or will not follow.” really looks like “hackers” trying to be
> too smart for me (but IANAL, so I wouldn’t know)
>
> It was written by Kyle Mitchell, a USA lawyer, who recently submitted (then withdrew) the License Zero Public License to the OSI. Heather Meeker & Luis Villa (also both lawyers and participants on the OSI lists) were also involved or at least on the advisory board.
It shows Kyle's characteristic interest in plain-language license
drafting -- which may ironically be what causes Thorsten to perceive
it as "written without a lawyer involved". Kyle would probably think
of himself as a hacker as well as a lawyer, in any event.
Richard
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list