[License-discuss] End of CAL discussion? Paging Arthur Brock.

[Bruce Perens]

I don't have questions, because I think I understand what Holonet is
intended to do. But Arthur reached out to me privately a while back,
expressing dismay that the technical reasons for the license weren't aired
to the degree he would have liked. IMO even if they were, this would not
have justified accepting the license as submitted. So, the attempt might
have been discarded as moot to the purpose of getting the license accepted.
But you will notice we seem to be at the end of the CAL 1 discussion,
leaving only that not addressed.

    Thanks

    Bruce

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:31 AM Andrew DeMarsh <andrew.dema at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'd like to ask that we all follow basic netiquette. being rude and
> "throwing shade" is extremely unprofessional. with that said @Bruce If you
> do have any questions for Arthur it may be best to ask them in the open and
> let Arthur decide if he wants to answer them. To put yourself in his shes
> can you blame him for not wanting to wade into a discussion he has no idea
> what the questions will be about and has obtained a lawyer to represent him
> on a list that is almost universally lawyers or people of immense knowledge
> in a legal field? I can say from personal experience although I believe
> that everyone here has the best of intentions such a question sounds like a
> crocodile offering passage across the river in his mouth. I say this as
> someone with no vested interest in this specific discussion.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:51 AM Bruce Perens via License-discuss <
> license-discuss at lists.opensource.org> wrote:
>
>> Luis,
>>
>> Please don't try to throw fuel on a fire. Van was obviously discomfited,
>> and I apologized just as soon as I could. You were not any part of the
>> discussion and will remain not a part.
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>     Bruce
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:09 PM Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:51 PM Bruce Perens via License-discuss <
>>> license-discuss at lists.opensource.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Van,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry! I did not mean to show disrespect for your technical competence.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you specify anywhere which technical questions Van has been unable
>>> to answer? If so I missed it.
>>>
>>> Luis
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bruce Perens - Partner, OSS.Capital.
>> _______________________________________________
>> License-discuss mailing list
>> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>>
>> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>


-- 
Bruce Perens - Partner, OSS.Capital.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190725/2a1b53ca/attachment.html>