[License-discuss] End of CAL discussion? Paging Arthur Brock.

[VanL]

Various individuals at my client, including Arthur, are reviewing a second
draft of the CAL before it is widely shared. When they ate done with their
review, the new draft will be posted here.

As for Arthur, it is his prerogative to join or not join any discussion he
would like. He is definitely aware of the discussions here.

Also, I would note that while my day job is as a lawyer, I understand the
technical details underlying the things I discuss.

Thanks,
Van



__________________________
Van Lindberg
van.lindberg at gmail.com
m: 214.364.7985

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019, 2:37 PM Bruce Perens via License-discuss <
license-discuss at lists.opensource.org> wrote:

> Are we finished discussing the Cryptographic Autonomy License?
>
> I am disappointed that Arthur Brock did not step up to explain his license
> and left all of the representation to Van. Van is not really an expert in
> the technical needs that motivated Arthur to ask him to work on that
> license, and in my private correspondence with Arthur, it seemed he had
> something to say.
>
> Van, this is not a court of law and I don't think there is a downside in
> having the client talk with us. Could you invite him to?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190723/2329f15c/attachment.html>