[License-discuss] Data portability as an obligation under an open source license

[Thorsten Glaser]

VanL dixit:

>And just so the actual scope is not further misconstrued, you only have to
>give the owner of the data an option to get a copy if the owner of the data
>has also received the software, or a portion thereof, or been a recipient
>of the services provided by the software from you.

This requires tracking of who’s really the “owner” of the data, and
whether those conditions are met… often undue burden.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
(gnutls can also be used, but if you are compiling lynx for your own use,
there is no reason to consider using that package)
	-- Thomas E. Dickey on the Lynx mailing list, about OpenSSL