[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1

Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil
Tue Feb 28 18:27:26 UTC 2017


ARL's policy (see 
https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/ARL-Open-Source-Guidance-and-Instructions#433214A2C17C11E6952E003EE1B763F8) 
cover this.  External contributions would be covered by the OSI-approved 
license, so the patent/IP terms in that license will cover those patent 
rights.

Thanks,
Cem Karan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org] On 
> Behalf Of Gervase Markham
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:17 PM
> To: license-discuss at opensource.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: 
> Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL
> OSL) Version 0.4.1
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the 
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a 
> Web browser.
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
> On 28/02/17 17:09, Smith, McCoy wrote:
> > You should consider the fact that CC0 has an express disclaimer of
> > patent licenses (in Section 4.a).  That may mean that it doesn't
> > address one of the concerns that I think you had (i.e., that there
> > might be USG patents covering the non-US copyrightable USG work
> > distributed by the USG).
> >
> > The CC licenses are also not on the OSI list (although there has been
> > some discussion in the past of whether they should be added, IIRC).
>
> Any objections to CC-0 also seemed to be patent-related; if the scheme had a 
> patent grant accompanying the CC-0 license, that might
> solve both of these issues in one go and lead to something very, very good.
>
> Gerv
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170228/a40bf434/attachment.p7s>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list