[License-discuss] Better MIT License ?

Joe Kua faltuemail0 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 29 11:39:02 UTC 2014


Hi,

Is this better than the original MIT license ? It has patent grants
which MIT lacks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, and under
any and all copyright and patent rights owned or freely
licensable by each licensor hereunder, whether an original
author or another licensor, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files
(the "Software"), to deal in current and future versions
of the Software without restriction, including without limitation
the rights to make, use, copy, modify, merge, link, sell,
offer for sale, import, export, have made, have sold, publish,
display, perform, create derivative works of, distribute,
redistribute, sub-license the Software, in source or object form,
and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished
to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright/patent notice and this permission notice
shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY
OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT
OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.



More information about the License-discuss mailing list