[License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing pages

[Bruce Perens]

On 06/11/2012 12:52 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> {scratches head} I think you must somehow be massively misreading what 
> I said. Perhaps you thought I'd expressed a view about using an API 
> (somehow) creating a derivative work? I didn't say anything of the sort.
It's regarding your statement:

    it doesn't seem likely to cast light on other areas of copyright
    law.  In particular, it cases none on what suffices to create a new
    work and what is a derivative work.

The point is that there's not /anything else/ in that body of law that 
would make the proposed work derivative.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120611/41045334/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120611/41045334/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120611/41045334/attachment.p7s>