contribution agreements for open source projects
mitchell at mozilla.com
Wed Sep 23 17:42:48 UTC 2009
On 9/23/09 10:23 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
>> On 9/23/09 9:04 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>>> On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:00 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>>>> Jeffrey O'Neill scripsit:
>>>>> Can anyone recommend a website that compares the contribution
>>>>> agreements used by different projects? I'd like to use one for my
>>>>> project, but I'd like to consider the options so I can make an
>>>>> informed choice.
>>>> Unfortunately, few projects post them.
>>> Nearly every Foundation that requires them that I've seen posts
>>> them. Apache, Eclipse, etc., etc.
>> Last I looked closely at Apache, it did NOT require assignment of
>> copyright. It was a bit confusing because even some Apache folks
>> would describe things this way, but they actually got a license. Has
>> this changed?
> Apache uses a system where you assign a perpetual, sub-licensable
> license to the Foundation for all the rights that matter (copyright,
> patent, etc.). Copyright (and all other rights) rest with the original
> author, but the Foundation gets the ability to license it how they see
> Yes, that's as i remember it. Not an assignment of ownership. The
> original owner remains the owner. It's a strong license though,
> especially in the Apache Foundation's ability for the foundation to
> relicense the code, which makes it a much further reaching license
> than many.
More information about the License-discuss