which license to use for software using components with GPL, LGPL and EPL?
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Tue Sep 1 08:36:08 UTC 2009
Ian Vernon wrote:
> Thanks for the enlightenment. Now if one wants to distribute its code open
> source what is the best choice other than redoing the conflicting parts?
Getting the copyright owners of all but one of the conflicting parts to
re-license it under a licence that doesn't conflict.
There is no easy way out.
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss