Individual authors recognition

Ben Tilly btilly at
Thu Jun 5 12:35:42 UTC 2008

On 6/5/08, Xavier Grehant <xavier.grehant at> wrote:
> > May be what you're looking for is the Artistic License.
>  >
> Indeed, this is the one I chose in the end. I especially like the
>  exclusion of works "that merely extend or make use of the Package"
>  like "scripts" or "interfaces". These are easy ways to hide the origin
>  of a work, and I'm glad to find a license that takes care of it.
>  Thank you Philippe for your in-depth answer.

Please note that the original Artistic license was not written by a
lawyer and has a number of issues.  The Artistic License 2.0 is a much
better choice to use.


More information about the License-discuss mailing list