Automatic GPL termination

[Alexander Terekhov]

On 9/12/07, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
[...]
> No sublicencing ! Tinkers does not provide any exclusive distribution right
> to Evers and Evers can't claim copyright reassignment and cannot add further
> restrictions even if he adds code or modifies it in his distribution.

And removal of permissions is what? How is that not adding restrictions?

regards,
alexander.

--
"PJ points out that lawyers seem to have difficulty understanding the
GPL. My main concern with GPLv3 is that - unlike v2 - non-lawyers can't
understand it either."
                                        -- Anonymous Groklaw Visitor