Question on OSI position on BSD/MIT licenses

[Chris Travers]

So am I right then that the OSI's position is that every possible wording of
the MIT, BSD, and similar licenses do not need to be approved for people to
claim that a project is Open Source?  I.e. that meeting the OSD is what is
important, not having the specific wording approved?

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20071001/d67fb5d7/attachment.html>