Question on OSD #5

[David Woolley]

Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:

>> Similarly, if I hand you a modified version of GPL v2 software with an
>> appropriately scoped NDA designed to prevent you from distributing the
>> software with my name attached (for example, designed to protect my
>> company from competitors knowing what I was up to),
> 
> I think that's probably fine, since it doesn't apply to the code.

If you have made modifications, the GPL requires that you include a 
proper statement of who owns the copyrights.  That would be in direct 
conflict with the NDA, so I would say that the GPL does not permit that 
case.

> 
> I assume you mean if the partners are "making or running the covered
> works [...] exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and
> control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your
> copyrighted material outside their relationship with you."
> 
> Of course, this is a very limited exception, and is more intended for
> subcontractors then general "partners".

I agree.  It is not intended to cover live use.  It only really covers 
the sort of use typically allowed by proprietary software developer 
licences.


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.