For Approval: Educational Community License 1.0

[Christopher D. Coppola]

> I'd urge you to explicitly structure this as Apache 2.0 + limitation,
> as that it makes it much easier to understand.  There's nothing like
> having to scan a long stretch of legalese, wondering just wherein it
> differs from a base license that you already understand.
>
This makes some sense. I'll consider it with some of the others in  
our community. My only hesitation is that we've had a 3 year campaign  
building common ground on the "Educational Community License" we have  
a lot of community education materials, and a bit of "brand  
recognition" in our community. For the sake of discussion on this  
list we could certainly consider it that way.

/Chris.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070419/d6cf0faa/attachment.html>