Help in choosing appropriate open-source license...

[Tony R]

BTW, thanks to Andew, Ernest, and John for their help and insight. If I ever
get one commercial licensee for Dialogos, I'll be happy to buy you guys a
nice dinner. If not, well, you might have to settle for a coffee :)

--Tony

On 2/14/06, Tony R <arajakum at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Very cool. 4.3 won't be a problem of course. Gee, I'm starting to really
> get into this techno-legal world. :P
>
> On 2/14/06, John Cowan < cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
> >
> > Wilson, Andrew scripsit:
> >
> > > Not sure this is allowed under section 3.4 of CDDL.
> > > Perhaps CDDL mavens would care to comment?
> >
> > 3.4 applies to You, that is, to the licensee.  He is the Original
> > Developer, so 3.4 is inapplicable.  Of course, he has to comply with
> > 4.3.
> >
> > --
> > There are three kinds of people in the world:   John Cowan
> > those who can count,                            http://www.ap.org
> > and those who can't.                             cowan at ccil.org
> >
>
>