--On 08 September 2005 08:46 +0100 Alex Bligh <alex at alex.org.uk> wrote: > Are we talking Hurst v. Picture Theatres Ltd [1915] 1 KB 1 here? If so, > I remember the ratio being exactly the opposite, which is why Mr Hurst > won damages in an action for assault as is contractual license As *his* contractual license... Alex