Permissions not granted by GPL

cody koeninger codykoeninger at
Wed Feb 16 04:52:08 UTC 2005

Apologies in advance if this question is inappropriate
or has already been covered.  I have read the GPL faq.
 I was not able to find a search interface for the
license-discuss list archives, and google coverage of
the list is very sparse.

Can someone point out the faults in the following line
of reasoning?

A. From section 0 of the GPL- "Activities other than
copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope." 
This seems to mean that the GPL does not grant
permissions regarding: public display and public
performance under US copyright law; making, using,
offering to sell, selling, and importing under US
patent; and use of a mark in commerce under US
trademark law.

B.  The GPL doesn't say that it is an integrated
agreement.  Projects such as GNU/Linux and Classpath
are distributed with terms added to those of the GPL. 
This seems to mean that a GPL project may be licensed
under terms additional to the GPL.


Therefore, it seems that an owner of the relevant
rights could decide to license a project under the
GPL, with additional terms granting the permissions
mentioned in A. 

Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 

More information about the License-discuss mailing list