Change ot topic, back to OVPL

[Russell Nelson]

Wrong committee's mailing list.

David Barrett writes:
 > Russell Nelson wrote:
 > > I can't imagine any unproven new license entering on any tier other
 > > than "not recommended".  Not much of a stick to pound people with if
 > > they know they're going to get hit no matter what.
 > 
 > Ah, that's interesting.  Will you be supplying a blurb of justification 
 > for why a license has been assigned a particular tier, or perhaps a 
 > blurb summarizing the reasons a license might be on a particular tier?
 > 
 > For example, if all new licenses are assigned to "not recommended", it 
 > would be nice to distinguish between those that are there because 
 > they're untried, versus there because they were tried and found lacking.
 > 
 > -david

-- 
--my blog is at     blog.russnelson.com         | with some experience 
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok |     you know what to do.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241       | with more experience
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |                       |     you know what not to do.