Dual licensing

[Marius Amado Alves]

> Sorry, but a word was missing in my sentence. you should read:
> Not because customers WANT closed  source, but simply because the same 
> customers also want to make internal development or internal use 
> which does not fit the GPL or other Open Source license.

No difference. I read "they" as "the same costumers" before.

Are you referring to proprietary software X that is forbidden by its one 
licensing terms to be combined with open source software Y, and 
therefore you need to 'unopen' Y to proceed? If that's the case, I 
conceed, but I don't see the point of a license like that of X.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3