Ian Lance Taylor ian at
Thu Oct 24 18:42:44 UTC 2002

"Ken Brown" <kenbrown at> writes:

> The inherent standard in court for copyright is ownership and control.  The
> GPL negates your individual permissions.  In addition, you revoke all rights
> to control distribution.  Sure you can say that there is a copyright, but to
> me its like claiming ownership of air. Read the copyright restrictions that
> lawyers right for copyrighted work.  They insist on 100% control of any and
> every alteration and permission on ALL distribution.  The GPL is the
> opposite.

Hardly the opposite.  There's all sorts of control in the GPL.  That's
why some people don't like it.  That's why Microsoft argues against

For no control, look to something like the MIT license.

license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list