I don't mean to whine, but
rauw at xs4all.!RemoveThisPlease!.nl
Wed Feb 27 01:42:32 UTC 2002
David Johnson wrote:
> But, and this is a big but, why does every trivial variant of
> an existing license need discussion? A far better approach is to
> institutionalize license templates.
I agree; this surely would save everyone a lot of time and confusion.
> I definitely recall a discussion on this one. Am I mistaken?
Yes, you are. :)
At least, there hasn't been any discussion in this group (until the last
post of Matthew C. Weigel, that is); perhaps it was discussed in private.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss