I don't mean to whine, but
david at usermode.org
Wed Feb 27 01:03:01 UTC 2002
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 03:31 pm, Russell Nelson wrote:
> I don't mean to whine, but nobody has said a word about these
Okay, quick examination:
I see no need to excercise my power of "veto" over this license. It clearly
passes the OSD. But, and this is a big but, why does every trivial variant of
an existing license need discussion? A far better approach is to
institutionalize license templates. Make every approved license be in
template form, so that companies like OpenE don't need to submit trivialities
Mainly a ditto of the above. It's more than just a trivial change to an
existing license, but still quite simple. And I do seem to recall a brief
discussion on this. Not willing to check the archives, I must assume my
memory is in error.
I definitely recall a discussion on this one. Am I mistaken?
> This list was set up so that "outsiders" could have veto power over
Veto power? You're kidding, aren't you? Where was this veto power when the
APSL was being discussed?
I've always that that this list was to discuss licenses informally, not to be
the main clearinghouse for license approval.
pgp public key on website
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss