GPL and commercial licensing, Amphora product
david at usermode.org
Tue Feb 5 02:57:48 UTC 2002
On Monday 04 February 2002 07:45 am, Jüri Kaljundi wrote:
> (http://www.amphora.ee/freeware/) is currently licensed under Mozilla type
> What we would like to do is to make potentially the free Amphora Light
> license a bit more relaxed, and for that we have considered starting to use
> the GPL License for the freeware version.
The GPL is more relaxed than a Mozilla type license? What exactly do you mean
by "relaxed?" Or is your Mozilla type license not really Mozilla like? I
usually classify licenses as strong copyleft (strict), weak copyleft
(somewhat relaxed), and unrestricted (very relaxed). The GPL fits in the
first category and the MPL in the second.
pgp public key on website
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss