Dual license?

[Kenneth Geisshirt]

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark Rauterkus wrote:

> I think ALL Gov software -- since it is PAID for by PUBLIC funds -- and used
> for a PUBLIC purpose, should be with PUBLIC licenses.

I agree - and some Danish government agencies do, too. That's why this
project must be Open Source.

> PS:
> > 2. If you are not an educational institution any derived work not be
> >    public available.

Sorry, typing error. The idea is to force non-educational to publish
derived work (substitute last not with must, please). GPL can do that, I
guess, but let us assume that I wish to be more liberal with educational
institution (they will never compete on the commercial software marked). 

Kneth

-- 
Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
GPG Fingerprint: 7424 AF49 AB47 03D4 D7C5  A07C 4D92 37E7 2F92 0B79
Computers are like air conditioners
                     they stop working properly if you open WINDOWS

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3