Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed
Eric Jacobs
eaj at ricochet.net
Mon Feb 12 22:27:13 UTC 2001
Brian DeSpain <bdespain at valinux.com>
>
> Yes - but the previous versions licensed under the GPL remain GPLd and
> development can continue on the code.
Can you explain why this is the case?
> > In reality, the code would most likely *fork,* leaving one strand open
> > and the other proprietary.
>
> That's exactly what would happen and that's why the GPL is there in the
> first place. The copyright owner retains copyright, therefore can make
> changes. You cannot retroactively change licenses under the GPL. People
> retain their original rights under the GPL.
How can licensees retain their rights against the copyright owner's
will? Is there something in the GPL that requires this?
--
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list