Two GPL Questions

Justin Wells jread at semiotek.com
Wed Dec 12 16:32:42 UTC 2001


On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:08:17PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > A reasonable compromise might be:
> > 
> >     "or any later version which has been approved for use by XYZ"
> 
> Problem being:  that's not GPL compatible, with current versions of the
> GPL.

Why not? It's not adding any restrictions. If anything it's an additional 
copyright grant beyond what is in the GPL. As the author of the software I 
am entitled to relicense it under as many licenses as I choose.

People are always free to drop the "or any later" clauses from the derived
works they create.

> If you wanted to preserve this option for your own current code, you
> might consider licensing under GPL and your own variant.  As the GPL
> itself is copyrighted, and _not_ under freely modifiable terms, this
> would probably require substantially different language.

But the phrase "or any later" is not in the GPL itself, it's something you 
place at the top of your own source code.

Justin

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



More information about the License-discuss mailing list