License backlog - OSI is making itself irrellevant

[Michael Tiemann]

Generally speaking, I agree with Russ.  In this specific case, it does look 
like Open Source to me.  I recommend we vote on this at the next board meeting.

M

P.S.  I could not attend the last board meeting due to multiple overlapping 
commitments at LinuxWorld in SF -- sorry guys.

Russell Nelson wrote:
> Roger Browne writes:
>  > We've been waiting for well over a year to have the Eiffel Forum License
>  > considered. It's a very simple license that is obviously open source.
> 
> The APSL was obviously open source.  Just go <this> way through the mine 
> field, my friend.
> 
> 


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3