License

[Jim Jagielski]

Justin Wells wrote:
> 
> The consensus on the list (license-discuss at opensource.org) has been 
> that you should draft a license which you think fits the definition
> and simply start using it. If your software is important enough to 
> draw attention, then sooner or later someone will be interested in
> seeing to it that your license is compliant. At that point one of
> the OSI principals would likely approach you and your license would
> wind its way through the approval process.
> 
> If you post your license to the license-discuss list you WILL likely
> get some useful feedback, but no approval, unless you are high 
> profile enough. In which case, go to Perens, etc., directly rather
> than via the list.
> 

Well, it appears to me that Apache is kinda important enough and
would have drawn at least some attention. But what do I know???

PS: Yep, I'm CCing to to license-discuss at opensource.org

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim at jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"