GNU GPL and Open Source Definition

[Seth David Schoen]

Signal 11 writes:

> I think the intent of the GPL is to be able to charge for /distribution/.
> The source (and derived binaries) is free in every sense of the word.
> If there's a bug in the GPL that doesn't reflect those ideals, it needs
> to be fixed.  E-mail rms and tell him to look into it. Unfortunately, his 
> exact e-mail is not in my possession, but e-mailing gnu at gnu.org should get 
> the same result.

Mr. Stallman's at rms at gnu.org, but I don't think he'd consider the ability
to sell free software for profit a bug.  Before reporting a bug in the GPL,
please read carefully all the documentation at

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/

-- 
                    Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org>
      They said look at the light we're giving you,  /  And the darkness
      that we're saving you from.   -- Dar Williams, "The Great Unknown"
  http://ishmael.geecs.org/~sigma/  (personal)  http://www.loyalty.org/  (CAF)