<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I have continued the discussion on license-discuss.</p>
    <p>Pam</p>
    <div class="moz-signature">Pamela S. Chestek<br>
      Chestek Legal<br>
      4641 Post St.<br>
      Unit 4316<br>
      El Dorado Hills, CA 95762<br>
      +1 919-800-8033<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/19/2026 8:35 AM, Carlo Piana via
      License-review wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1917761291.14756569.1781883352460.JavaMail.zimbra@piana.eu">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div
style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__">
        <div data-marker="__HEADERS__">
          <blockquote
style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>Da:
            </b>"Kevin P. Fleming via License-review"
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:license-review@lists.opensource.org">&lt;license-review@lists.opensource.org&gt;</a><br>
            <b>A: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:license-review@lists.opensource.org">"license-review@lists.opensource.org"</a>
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:license-review@lists.opensource.org">&lt;license-review@lists.opensource.org&gt;</a><br>
            <b>Cc: </b>"Kevin P. Fleming"
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us">&lt;lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us&gt;</a><br>
            <b>Inviato: </b>Giovedě, 18 giugno 2026 15:00:43<br>
            <b>Oggetto: </b>Re:  [License-review] : [License] Linkumori
            Free License, Version 1.0 \u2013 Submission for OSI Review<br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">
          <blockquote
style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
            <div>On Wed, Jun 17, 2026, at 14:51, subham mahesh wrote:</div>
            <blockquote id="qt" style="">
              <div dir="auto">
                <div dir="auto">
                  <div dir="auto">What I'm asking from this list is a
                    substantive review of Section 4 on its merits:
                    whether the mechanism works, whether the
                    registered-domain standard holds up, where the edge
                    cases are. If the consensus after that review is
                    that this is better solved as a collaborative effort
                    or folded into existing work, I'm open to that
                    conversation. I'm not, however, looking to have the
                    submission deprioritized purely on the basis that
                    I'm an individual rather than an organization, or
                    that the license doesn't yet have large-scale
                    adoption. Plenty of OSI-approved licenses started
                    exactly there.</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            <div>That is a topic for the license-discuss list, not the
              license-review list.<br>
              (Also, there's no need to put a '[License]' tag in the
              subjects of messages you send to these lists, it's pretty
              well understood that all topics on these lists are about
              licenses!)</div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I agree on both. </div>
          <div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
          </div>
          <div>Besides, not having an active project with an urgency to
            adopt a license or to have it approved, I would suggest
            deferring license review for when the text has been widely
            discussed and not subject to change. This discussion IMHO
            (or IMNSHO) belongs more there, for the time being. </div>
          <div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
          </div>
          <div>Also worth nothing that "this happened in the past" is
            not a valid argument for the same to happen in the future. </div>
          <div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
          </div>
          <div>Cheers</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Carlo</div>
          <div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-review mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>