<html><body><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>Da: </b>"Kevin P. Fleming via License-review" <license-review@lists.opensource.org><br><b>A: </b>"license-review@lists.opensource.org" <license-review@lists.opensource.org><br><b>Cc: </b>"Kevin P. Fleming" <lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us><br><b>Inviato: </b>Giovedì, 18 giugno 2026 15:00:43<br><b>Oggetto: </b>Re: [License-review] : [License] Linkumori Free License, Version 1.0 \u2013 Submission for OSI Review<br></blockquote></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><div>On Wed, Jun 17, 2026, at 14:51, subham mahesh wrote:</div><blockquote id="qt" style=""><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">What I'm asking from this list is a substantive review of Section 4 on its merits: whether the mechanism works, whether the registered-domain standard holds up, where the edge cases are. If the consensus after that review is that this is better solved as a collaborative effort or folded into existing work, I'm open to that conversation. I'm not, however, looking to have the submission deprioritized purely on the basis that I'm an individual rather than an organization, or that the license doesn't yet have large-scale adoption. Plenty of OSI-approved licenses started exactly there.</div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>That is a topic for the license-discuss list, not the license-review list.<br>(Also, there's no need to put a '[License]' tag in the subjects of messages you send to these lists, it's pretty well understood that all topics on these lists are about licenses!)</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree on both. </div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Besides, not having an active project with an urgency to adopt a license or to have it approved, I would suggest deferring license review for when the text has been widely discussed and not subject to change. This discussion IMHO (or IMNSHO) belongs more there, for the time being. </div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Also worth nothing that "this happened in the past" is not a valid argument for the same to happen in the future. </div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Carlo</div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div></div></div></body></html>