<div dir="ltr">The License states it was made with ai, but it also says that "humans shouldn't be able to copyright claim ai content"<div>As i saw in Vol 149, Issue 6:</div><div><br></div><div>"A note on</div>meta-context This license was initially drafted with AI assistance (Claude,<br>Anthropic) at the direction of a human. We believe this is appropriate and<br>have disclosed it in the repository. The license is itself an example of<br>the category of work it governs. We welcome feedback from the committee and<br>the community at large."<div><br></div><div>While the License says:<br></div><div><br></div><div>"3. NO COPYRIGHT CLAIM (Fully AI-generated only)</div> When the "Fully AI-generated" box is checked, the Originator<br> makes no copyright claim over the Software. The Software is<br> dedicated to the public domain to the maximum extent<br> permitted by applicable law. Where public domain dedication<br> is not legally possible, the Originator grants a perpetual,<br> irrevocable, royalty-free license to all parties for any<br> purpose."<br><br>AND the Readme of the license on "GitHub" says<br>"
<em style="box-sizing:border-box;color:rgb(89,99,110);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI","Noto Sans",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji";font-size:16px">This license was itself written by an AI (Claude, Anthropic) at the direction of a human author. We think that's fitting."</em><br><div><br></div><div>Therefore it contradicts itself and has no legal meaning.</div></div>