<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    I would suggest that you submit the license to license-discuss
    before submitting it to license-review.  License-discuss is meant
    for working on the kinks in a work in progress and license-review is
    when the license is finalized and begins the formal process of
    approval. Once a license has been submitted to license-review it
    can't change and instead will have to be withdrawn and resubmitted,
    withdrawn and resubmitted, if you want to make changes. This is very
    challenging for the license-review committee to manage. So it's best
    to have the language as final as possible before submitting it for
    approval.<br>
    <br>
    Pam<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">Pamela S. Chestek<br>
      Chestek Legal<br>
      4641 Post St.<br>
      Unit 4316<br>
      El Dorado Hills, CA 95762<br>
      +1 919-800-8033<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/21/2026 9:17 AM, M.samet Duman via
      License-review wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:18953FBC-E90B-4BCE-9321-7073C1CD07BB@icloud.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
      <div>
        <div>Hello Pamela,</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Yes, I am withdrawing this draft from formal review.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>The text discussed was an early draft, and I will resubmit
          only after Version 2 is finalized and formally published.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Thank you for the clarification.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best regards,  </div>
        <div>Mehmet Samet Duman</div>
        <div>Author of Project Tick</div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div>Pamela Chestek <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">&lt;pamela@chesteklegal.com&gt;</a> \u015funlar\u0131
            yazd\u0131 (21 Oca 2026 19:56):</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <div>
            <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
              charset=UTF-8">
            <div> So I assume you are withdrawing this license?<br>
              <br>
              Pam<br>
              <br>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Pamela S. Chestek<br>
                Chestek Legal<br>
                4641 Post St.<br>
                Unit 4316<br>
                El Dorado Hills, CA 95762<br>
                +1 919-800-8033<br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
                  moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                  href="http://www.chesteklegal.com/"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
                <br>
                On 1/21/2026 8:23 AM, M.samet Duman via License-review
                wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite"
                cite="mid:AC8AAC95-CE30-4EC4-8D28-1AA5A16A3F52@icloud.com">
                <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
                  charset=UTF-8">
                <div>Thank you for your honest feedback. It's accurate
                  to say so.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I should have made it clear from the outset that
                  the text under discussion was a draft and that a
                  revised version was already planned for publication.
                  It was my mistake not to state this from the
                  beginning, and I understand how frustrating that can
                  be in a review context.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>The aim was not to waste reviewers' time, but to
                  verify that the direction of the changes was
                  consistent with the Open Source Definition before
                  publication. However, I fully agree that the correct
                  approach would have been to wait for the text to be
                  finalized or to explicitly label it as a draft in the
                  initial submission.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Nevertheless, thank you for your time and
                  attention, and I will be more careful about timing and
                  framing in future submissions.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Sincerely,</div>
                <div>Mehmet Samet Duman</div>
                <div>Author of Project Tick</div>
                <div><br>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div>Kevin P. Fleming <a
                        class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                        href="mailto:lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">&lt;lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us&gt;</a>
                      \u015funlar\u0131 yazd\u0131 (21 Oca 2026 19:12):</div>
                    <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                    <div>
                      <title></title>
                      <div>
                        <div>On Wed, Jan 21, 2026, at 10:32, <a
                            href="http://m.samet/"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">M.samet</a> Duman via
                          License-review wrote:</div>
                        <blockquote type="cite" id="qt"
                          style="overflow-wrap:break-word;">
                          <div>I wanted to clarify that the license
                            version you reviewed is an earlier draft.
                            The revised Version 2 of the Project Tick
                            General Public License will be released on
                            February 2, 2026, and will explicitly
                            address the concerns you raised.</div>
                        </blockquote>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Since you didn't mention this in your
                          submission, you've now asked people in this
                          group to review a license which you plan to
                          replace in less than two weeks. This will not
                          make you any friends in the review group, to
                          say the least.</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                <br>
                <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
                <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-review mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" moz-do-not-send="true">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender
            and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative.
            Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent
            from an opensource.org email address.<br>
            <br>
            License-review mailing list<br>
            <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-review mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>