<div dir="ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>This license page is now available at <a href="https://opensource.org/license/los-alamos-national-labs-bsd-3-variant">https://opensource.org/license/los-alamos-national-labs-bsd-3-variant</a></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:10 PM Pamela Chestek <<a href="mailto:pamela.chestek@opensource.org">pamela.chestek@opensource.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>

  
    
  
  <div>
    <p>All,<br>
      <br>
      At its Board meeting on September 20, 2024, the Board adopted the
      recommendation of the License Review Committee and <i>approved </i>the
      Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License as an Open Source
      Initiative Certified License.<br>
      <br>
      Pamela Chestek<br>
      Chair, License Committee<br>
      Open Source Initiative <br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div>On 9/13/2024 10:03 PM, Pamela Chestek
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <p>All,<br>
        <br>
        Below is the recommendation of the License Committee that the
        Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License be approved as an
        Open Source Initiative Certified license. The Board will vote on
        the license at the next Board meeting, scheduled for September
        20.<br>
        <br>
        Please respond to this email if you have any comments or
        questions.<br>
        <br>
        Pamela Chestek<br>
        Chair, License Committee<br>
        Open Source Initiative</p>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <p>==========</p>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <p>License: Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License
        (Exhibit A)<br>
        Submitted: June 26, 2024,
        <a href="https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2024-June/005490.html" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2024-June/005490.html</a><br>
        Decision date: due no later than the first Board meeting after
        August 26, 2024<br>
        <br>
        License Review Committee Recommendation: <br>
        <br>
        <i>Resolved that it is the opinion of the OSI that the Los
          Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License be approved as an
          Open Source Initiative Certified license in the Non-Reusable
          category of licenses.<br>
        </i><br>
        <u>Rationale Document</u><br>
        <br>
        Notes: This is a legacy license, already in use for a number of
        projects created under the auspices of the Los Alamos National
        Lab. It is a standard BSD-3 license with an additional
        disclaimer that imposes only a restriction that changes to the
        software must be marked, which is commonly found in open source
        licenses. There was only one substantive comment on the license,
        which was that it should be approved.<br>
        <br>
        <u>Exhibit A</u><br>
        <br>
        Copyright (c) XXXX, Los Alamos National Security, LLC<br>
        All rights reserved.<br>
        Copyright XXXX. Los Alamos National Security, LLC. This software
        was produced under U.S. Government contract DE-AC52-06NA25396
        for Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), which is operated by
        Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of
        Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and
        distribute this software.  NEITHER THE GOVERNMENT NOR LOS ALAMOS
        NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC MAKES ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
        OR ASSUMES ANY LIABILITY FOR THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.  If
        software is modified to produce derivative works, such modified
        software should be clearly marked, so as not to confuse it with
        the version available from LANL.<br>
        <br>
        Additionally, redistribution and use in source and binary forms,
        with or without modification, are permitted provided that the
        following conditions are met:<br>
        1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above
        copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
        disclaimer.<br>
        2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
        copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
        disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
        with the distribution.<br>
        3. Neither the name of Los Alamos National Security, LLC, Los
        Alamos National Laboratory, LANL, the U.S. Government, nor the
        names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote
        products derived from this software without specific prior
        written permission.<br>
        <br>
        THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC
        AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,
        INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
        MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
        DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC
        OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
        SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
        LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF
        USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
        AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
        LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
        IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF
        THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.<br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </p>
      <div>On 6/26/2024 8:50 AM, Pettinger, Adam
        L via License-review wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        
        
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          Hello,</div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          We are trying to get a package (<a href="https://github.com/UTNuclearRoboticsPublic/netft_utils" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://github.com/UTNuclearRoboticsPublic/netft_utils" target="_blank">https://github.com/UTNuclearRoboticsPublic/netft_utils</a>)
          distributed, and there is a small ambiguity in the licensing
          situation, see here (<a href="https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/41583" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/41583" target="_blank">https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/41583</a>)
          for discussion.</div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          We determined that the best way forward is to get the license
          for the project approved by the OSI. See the attached file for
          the license text, but it is basically a Los Alamos National
          Lab (LANL) flavored BSD-3, and would be similar to (<a href="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" target="_blank">https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl</a>).</div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          I believe the legacy license path makes the most sense for
          this, although that depends on how "unrelated" the entities
          must be. Here is a list of projects using the license (<a href="https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php" target="_blank">https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php</a>),
          and they are only related in that</div>
        <ol start="1">
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              The authors have some affiliation with LANL and</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              The Feynman Center at LANL has approved them for open
              source release.</div>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          The reason I think legacy makes sense is that the license is
          already used many places, and the ability to change the
          wording in it at this point is questionable.</div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          I will follow the legacy submission going forward, but please
          let me know if you think I should update and switch to the new
          license requirements. Per the guidelines on the website:</div>
        <ul>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              The license text is attached</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              It complies with the Open Source Definition, including
              clauses 3, 5, 6, and 9</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              Here is a list of projects using the license: (<a href="https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php" target="_blank">https://www.lanl.gov/software/open-source-software.php</a>)</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              The lisence steward would be the Intellectual Property
              Team at the Richard P. Feynman Center for Innovation at
              LANL. Phone: (505) 665-9090. Email: <a href="mailto:software@lanl.gov" target="_blank">software@lanl.gov</a></div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              Unknown other approvals or information</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              Following (<a href="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" target="_blank">https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl</a>),
              I propose the name: Los Alamos National Lab BSD Variant
              License and identifier BSD-3-Clause-LANL</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              No other existing IDs</div>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          If it must be considered a new license, additional information
          would be:</div>
        <ul>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              Gap to be filled: ability to release projects approved by
              LANL and using their license</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              The most similiar (<a href="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" id="m_-5970296464464236721LPlnk" title="https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl" target="_blank">https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause-lbnl</a>),
              and really is quite close. Mostly just substituting LBNL
              naming with LANL naming</div>
          </li>
          <li style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
              Not sure what review the license has been through</div>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          Please let me know if you have any questions, thanks!</div>
        <div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
          <br>
        </div>
        <div id="m_-5970296464464236721Signature">
          <p><span style="font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif"><b>Adam
                Pettinger</b></span></p>
          <p><span style="font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif">Senior
              Research Engineer</span></p>
          <p style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:rgb(10,10,10);background-color:rgb(254,254,254)"><a href="mailto:adam.pettinger@tamu.edu" id="m_-5970296464464236721OWAa155aa77-57cb-8faa-81de-4ede5a82108d" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px" target="_blank">adam.pettinger@tamu.edu</a></span></p>
          <p><span style="font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif;color:rgb(80,0,0);background-color:white"><b>TEXAS
                A&M ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION DESIGN LAB</b></span></p>
          <p><a href="https://rad.engr.tamu.edu/" id="m_-5970296464464236721OWA36f4aab8-a5ba-e68b-082c-bcd3d53c8bb4" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px" target="_blank">https://rad.engr.tamu.edu/</a></p>
          <p> </p>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset></fieldset>
        <pre>_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an <a href="http://opensource.org" target="_blank">opensource.org</a> email address.

License-review mailing list
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an <a href="http://opensource.org" target="_blank">opensource.org</a> email address.

License-review mailing list
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <div>-- <br>
      Pamela S. Chestek
      Chair, License Committee
      Open Source Initiative</div>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an <a href="http://opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">opensource.org</a> email address.<br>
<br>
License-review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div>