<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/15/2020 9:27 AM, Simon Phipps
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA4ffp_-6+XJyvQJpeQc_Y7gQatbFhPRRY+n__-_VFMD_CuSGg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:34
            PM Langley, Stuart <<a
              href="mailto:Stuart.Langley@disney.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true">Stuart.Langley@disney.com</a>>
            wrote:</div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div><font size="2" face="Calibri"><span
                  style="font-size:11pt">
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>The issue this creates is that the author can’t
                    make a valid transfer to the public domain. 
                    Transfers are not allowed.  The author’s completely
                    clear and unambiguous intent to transfer does not
                    change that. The only option is to license
                    sufficient rights. 
                    Without a license, even if the author does not
                    assert copyright, their heirs might.</div>
                </span></font></div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>OSI has previously advised that "public domain" does not
            qualify as open source because exactly this sort of issue,
            varying in scope and consequence globally, prevents
            developers from being sure they have the necessary rights
            without consulting another person first. See <a
              href="https://opensource.org/node/878"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://opensource.org/node/878</a></div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    The difference with the Unlicense is that it <i>also</i> clearly
    states what rights are granted. Does that not resolve any concern
    with the Unlicense?<br>
    <br>
    Pam<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Pamela S. Chestek<br>
    Chestek Legal<br>
    PO Box 2492<br>
    Raleigh, NC 27602<br>
    919-800-8033<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
  </body>
</html>