<div dir="ltr"><div>Seems like this should be an obvious case to approve?</div><div><br></div><div>For reference, the text that is omitted vs 2-clause BSD seems to be: "2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution."</div><div><br></div><div>henrik<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:07 PM Pedro Giffuni <<a href="mailto:pfg@freebsd.org">pfg@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello;<br>
<br>
While doing a sweep through the FreeBSD code tree, I found yet another<br>
variant of the BSD license which I have dubbed BSD-1-Clause license:<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/include/ifaddrs.h?revision=326823" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/include/ifaddrs.h?revision=326823</a><br>
<br>
__________<br>
<br>
Copyright (c) [Year]<br>
[Name of Organization] {All rights reserved}.<br>
<br>
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without<br>
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions<br>
are met:<br>
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright<br>
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.<br>
<br>
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY [Name of Organization] ``AS IS'' AND<br>
ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE<br>
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE<br>
ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE<br>
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL<br>
DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS<br>
OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)<br>
HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT<br>
LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY<br>
OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF<br>
SUCH DAMAGE.<br>
<br>
__________<br>
<br>
Rationale:<br>
<br>
The license was originally used by Berkeley Software Design, a<br>
commercial fork of the Berkeley Software Distribution, as a further<br>
simplification of the traditional BSD license. Unlike the so-called 0BSD<br>
license, which is much more recent, it preserves the original form and<br>
wording of the BSD license, and is a complement to existing simplifications<br>
like the 3-Clause-BSD and 2-Clause-BSD licenses.<br>
<br>
Proliferation category:<br>
<br>
Licenses that are popular and widely used or with strong communities<br>
<br>
<br>
As a sidenote I'll say the license variant is not popular, but the code<br>
will be at least in FreeBSD for the foreseeable future and there is no<br>
real reason to add more clauses to the existing code.<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
License-review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><a href="mailto:henrik.ingo@avoinelama.fi" target="_blank">henrik.ingo@avoinelama.fi</a><br>+358-40-5697354 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo<br><a href="http://www.openlife.cc" target="_blank">www.openlife.cc</a><br><br>My LinkedIn profile: <a href="http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7" target="_blank">http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7</a></div>