<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>No apologies. I wrote OSL 3.0. Don't ignore it. Larry</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757">Sent from my phone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> </div><div>Date: 10/24/18 1:07 PM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review@lists.opensource.org> </div><div>Cc: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>, Brendan Hickey <brendan.m.hickey@gmail.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [License-review] OSD #9 would not make SSPL OSD-incompliant </div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr">> A state of universal F.U.D.<br><div><br></div><div>In which lawyers point out our errors without being at all helpful in resolving the issue :-)</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</body></html>